New - Web Guide: Ecology, Solidarity, Personal Growth, Social Change, Countries ... Shopping Guide: Books, DVD, Music ... - Español Contents, Index, Random - Board - Donate, About

People in Action: Message Board: Web Guide: Solidarity: Human Rights: Women's Rights

Guide Board More

Women's Rights

Message board, and more on Women's Rights -> Websites Messages

Related topics:

Human Rights

Derechos de la Mujer - Español

Pages Women's Rights - Page 1 2 3 Board Search | Last Day, Three Days, Week | Log In | Log Out | Register | Profile | Tree | Help

David Raj New Collaborator Registered: Aug 2007 Post Number: 1 Aug 13, 2007 - 12:12    Sexual Harassment of women at the work place Sexual harassment , an insidious form of violence against women, is common to all cultures. The stories are strikingly similar from country to country; only the names and the places change . Sexual harassment can take a variety of forms . It includes both physical violence and subtle forms of non-physical violence such as emotional and psychological harm or suffering to women, including economic and professional injuries, Like other forms of violence, sexual harassment to the work place is a demonstration of power and control and above all it exemplifies a form of gender discrimination or gender inequality, Examples of sexual harassment from around the world have shown that the elimination of this problem is a difficult task , women often fear retribution if they report inappropriate conduct, hence they rarely report instances of sexual harassment, The victims are ashamed or embarrassed about their experiences and they feel that their claims will not be taken seriously , Even if a women does report sexual harassment, it is often difficult to prove the occurrence of sexual harassment due to lack of circumstantial evidence and witnesses unwilling to testify in support of the victim, This is because either the conduct occurs when the two parties are alone or other employees are afraid of jeopardizing their own jobs . Employers too, often fail to treat the problem of sexual harassment seriously or appropriately Often organizations do not take measures for prevention of sexual harassment at their premises until ti becomes unbearable for some of their female employees or another crisis arises . This booklet provides a general understanding of the problem of sexual harassment of women at the work place, the exiting international safeguards, the legal approaches adopted by different countries , the Indian approach to the problem and the initiatives taken by the National Human Rights Commission ( NHRC) Protection Against Sexual Harassment in International Law In countries that provide legal protection against sexual harassment two types of conduct in work place have generally been prohibited 1. Quid pro quo sexual harassment , and 2. Harassment that creates a hostile work environment , 1. Quid pro quo Sexual Harassment Quid pro quo is a Latin phrase meaning something for something quid pro quo sexual harassment refers to a demand of sexual favors and the threat of adverse job consequences if the demand is refused . To establish a prima facie case of quid pro quo sexual harassment, a plaintiff must show that : 1. the employee belongs to a protected class; 2. the employer subjected the employee to unwelcome conduct in the form of sexual advances or requests for sexual favours; 3. the harassment was bases upon sex; and 4. the employee’s acceptance or rejection of the harassment was an express or imides condition to the receipt of a job benefit or the cause of a tangible job detriment, If a plaintiff in a sexual harassment case is able to establish each of the above elements, then the burden to prove otherwise shifts to the employer employee must then establish that the reasons provided by the employer are not the real reasons for the employment decision and are merely a pretext for unlawful discrimination,

David Raj New Collaborator Registered: Aug 2007 Post Number: 2 Aug 13, 2007 - 12:16    3. hostile work Environment Sexual Harassment Sexual harassment also accurse when an individual experiences physical conduct of a sexual nature where such conduct has the purpose of effect of unreasonably interfering with that individual’s work performance or creating an intimidating , hostile , or offensive working environment. To establish a prima fancies case of sexual harassment based on hostile work environment , a plaintiff must show that : 1. the plaintiff belongs to a protected class; 2. the plaintiff was subjected to unwelcome sexual harassment ; 3. the harassment was bases on sex: 4. the harassment affected a term , condition , or privilege of employment; and 5. the employer knew or should have known the conduct was occurring . The United Nations and other international organizations have all recognized that women’s rights are human rights, and that violence against women is violation of the human rights of women. These organizations have specifically condemned sexual harassment in a series of international instruments as a prohibited form of violence against women, As sexual harassment violates the rights to just and favorable conditions of work, this fact has been recognized by the United Nations in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights ( UDHR), the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). In addition, a government’s failure to provide an effective remedy to the victims of sexual harassment violates the rights to an effective remedy for the violation of fundamental human rights guaranteed by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the UDHR. As such the United Nations has emphasized the responsibility of member states to create conditions that protect the human rights of individuals and in particular of women in public and private life, and has acknowledged that governments may be made responsible for inaction in the face of human rights abuses by private actors just as they are for abuses committed by state actors . This express condemnation of human rights violations commonly experienced by women relicts a growing recognition international organizations and non-governmental organizations , largely ignored the experiences of women by focusing mainly on violations of civil and political rights, Notwithstanding the serious limitation in these documents with respect to sexual harassment the strong international condemnation of sexual harassment may provide the necessary legitimacy to people at large working to adopt national legislations to prohibit sexual harassment in countries that have not yet addressed the problem. The following paragraphs look into a few of the prominent United Nations Conventions, which address the issue of sexual harassment. The United nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)

Matt Visitor Sep 19, 2007 - 18:22    Here's A Funny Joke Women Have Rights LOL JKZ Matt Degrassi (cartman57@hotmail.com)

Mike Visitor Apr 17, 2008 - 22:51    Im a step-dad. Well, not yet. I'm engaged to a beautiful and loving young woman. We live in North Ga, somewhat happily until the last couple of weeks. My fiancee's child's father was under strict supervised visitation until this past week. He has had a restraining order placed against him, 2 DFCS investigations (both Ga. and Tn.), has sent racially biased pictures and messages to the childs mother, admitted to striking the child (who is a 3 yr old little girl), and has posted vulgar and drug related pictures of himself on the internet. This person has not been alone with this child in almost 1 year. His visitis have consisted of 2 hours while being over seen by a counselor. This child has been in counseling for 1 year now to do diagnosed post traumatic stress syndrome. This particular county's Judicial system has now written an order, which was written by the father's attorneys, allowing the father 6 weekends in a row worth of unsupervised visitation. The father has 2 attorneys working on this and unforntunately the mother has only one, and her previous attorney agreed to this order without the consent of the mother. She has proof she did not agree to this and was mis-represented, pictures, counselors reports, and more, but yet the judge refuses to amend the order. Would you like to know why? She is basically being discriminated against, and the main victim in the whole thing is this little girl. I don't have any idea on what to do. We are out of money, noone will listen, the judges won't work with us, and her last attorney even insulted and belittled her in an email making comments about her morals and personal life. She is a good person. The child is happy and healthy. This is all wrong. Please offer advice. What do you do when you are a victim of the "buddy system" and you can't seem to find a helping hand, nor able to afford one? We are desparate to help this child. The mother doesn;t want to keep the child away from the father, but she does want to protect her. Now that an attorney who let down his client and a biased judge have signed an order, we have no hope. She will be left to the wolves, and if we refuse to let her go, we will be punsihed. What do we do? We need any help or advice we can get. Please if you have had a similar ordeal or know of someone, or an institution, that could help, please let us know. We both work full time, are students, and are just getting by the best that we can. The mother's parents are both diabled (her father being a disabled vet) and on limited income, and my family just doesnt have it to help us.

Evelyn Collaborator Registered: Sep 2008 Post Number: 25 Mar 03, 2009 - 03:44    Bin Laden has avenged Americans' secret depravity upon her maiden warriors. The world's majority supports the U.S. in the war on terror, but can the world rescue them from their own anything-goes rules of war? Their screams of horror are distorted and stifled, and their chastity is fair game.

Author Assistant New Collaborator Registered: Apr 2009 Post Number: 1 Apr 04, 2009 - 03:11    If you are looking for an interesting and informative read on women's rights under Islam, check out the book "Contesting Justice: Women, Islam, Law, and Society" by Ahmed Souaiaia. Professor Souaiaia teaches courses at the University of Iowa that deal with this subject. Here's one of his interviews that talks about his book as well as his personal views; if you're looking for more, definitely check out the book. It just came out in paperback! ------------------- The Dangers of Gendered Rights: "The Persistence of Social Injustice Requires that it is Addressed forwardly—that is in the Context of a Post-Gendered World:" An Interview with the Author of Contesting Justice Interviewed by Sarah Raaii, April, 2008 __________________________________________________________________ Describe the process of writing Contesting Justice. How did you arrive at your conclusions? It started with writing a controversial article about two of the most contentious topics in Islamic law: polygamy and inheritance. The article became the topic of a number of presentations which provided a good venue for commenting on my work. I took into consideration those comments and went back to the sources. After looking at some additional materials and employing new methodologies, I revised some of my original conclusions and strengthened others… The outcome is a work that I see as more challenging than informing, more questioning than answering, and more thought-provoking than mind-numbing. What was most challenging about creating this book? Simplifying the approach and legal analysis to make the book accessible to non-specialist readers How did you simplify the book without sacrificing the content? The process involved providing more details than I would usually do if I were writing for an audience of experts. So it was not about omitting content. The difficulty was to anticipate the appropriate level of familiarity with the content and not go below it, which carries the risk of talking to the audience instead of having a conversation with them. Does Islam work against women's rights, or has it been corrupted? It depends on what or which Islam you have in mind. Perhaps a better way of making the distinction is to ask, "Does the Qur'an work against women?" The answer is fairly easy; no. Certainly the Prophet Muhammad was also an advocate for women and the vulnerable. But with time, that initial progress either stopped or was scaled back. Therefore, Islam today, with all its diverse manifestations and multiplicity of views, many of which may have been appropriated and manipulated by the new elite, does contain a strain of expressions that work against women. What is the differentiating factor between the Middle East and the Western world, if it is not religion? First, for the purpose of answering this question, perhaps it is better to say the Arab or Muslim world instead of the Middle East. Second, the answer can be framed as follows: the Muslim world's economic and political status as weak and undisciplined party that has bet its fortunes on its alliances with the Superpowers instead of trusting its people. You can see this difference today in the level of disconnect between the rulers and the ruled all over the Arab and Muslim worlds; the loss of sense of pride in being citizen; and the despair that is causing the brain-drain: the siphoning of talented and knowledgeable young men and women… What is the biggest obstacle Muslim women face today? The same problem faced by the Muslim men and women: total absence of civil society institutions, lack of civility in the political discourse, and abuse of power.

Author Assistant New Collaborator Registered: Apr 2009 Post Number: 2 Apr 04, 2009 - 03:12    (continuation of the last post) Can and should the Western world do anything to help? It can't and it should not. The invasion of Iraq proved that despite the brutality and unpopularity of an Arab regime—such as that of Saddam—not all people are willing to replace such a regime with an occupation force. It is best for the West to stay out of the affairs of Muslim societies and work on staying true to the values to which they subscribe. Because many citizens of the West are Muslim and the number is growing, it may be more effective to empower Muslims here to remain proud citizens, which will serve as a model for the people of the Muslim world. To not subject Muslims in the West to discrimination and racism amounts to teaching by example; this is much more effective than dictating, lecturing, and invading. There are two major proven ways of excluding the vulnerable and the insignificant "other:" legal exclusion and social exclusion. In other words, there are two ways one social group could achieve economic and political advantage over another: legal discrimination and social oppression. In the West, exclusion of women and minorities has been achieved through societal oppression. That is partly why it took more than two hundred years for the first woman to be a serious contender for the presidency, despite constitutional guarantees. In some Muslim countries, women and religious minorities are excluded from running for high political offices by law. Is there a difference between the two if the outcome is the same? A case can be made that societal oppression is more effectively enduring than legal exclusion. After all, all that it will take to change the situation in a Muslim country is to change the law to allow women to compete for the presidency or prime ministry and a woman could win; it happened in Bangladesh, Turkey, and Pakistan. Can we say the same about the chance of an American-Muslim winning the presidency in the next half century? I doubt it and the proof is played before us today in the form of "accusations" that Senator Obama might be Muslim (as if it is a crime), although running for the presidency is a right the Constitution guarantees to every citizen--including Muslim-Americans. In the past five years or so, we learned that abuse of power, torture of people, and disregard to international law can be undertaken by the leaders we elected right here at home. Before lecturing others about human rights and democracy, we must work to preserve the values and principles we want the rest of the world to emulate and adopt. That will be the best way to help people elsewhere. Furthermore, many American scholars and activists who have never visited a Muslim country, a South or Central American country, an African country, or an Asian country are knowingly or unknowingly perpetuating a supremacist (or racist) undertone when they rant about and critique other countries and other societies for human rights abuses and keep silent about abuses by the governments they elect. It can be argued that their energy and expertise can be better used here in a society, in a culture, in a political system with which they are most familiar. As the saying goes, charity starts at home. When Americans fight for respecting the dignity of every citizen, that commitment and determination can help empower others to work within their own communities. Sincere respect to human dignity is inspiring; calculated humanitarianism is hypocritical. This is especially important when considering the colonial history of the West and the persistent discrimination against vulnerable social groups within America. If the West is not to interfere in Middle Eastern countries' transformations, who will make sure civil society institutions like free press and watchdog organizations are protected? The people who fought to establish the civil society institutions in the first place will. But I would ask, who is protecting the civil society institution in the West? Would any Western nation allow another country to interfere in its internal affairs in the name of empowering the people against their government? The question in itself is expressive of the damage done by colonial powers first directly—through military intervention; and then indirectly—through influence and sponsorship of dictatorial regimes: the damage seeded in the mind of many Muslims that they are not responsible for their own future; that they need Western help to achieve their aspirations; that they don't have the power to bring about change. I would argue that even if the West were to establish civil society institutions, the West would be expected to stay there in perpetuity to protect them because citizens of those countries won't develop a sense of ownership.

Author Assistant New Collaborator Registered: Apr 2009 Post Number: 3 Apr 04, 2009 - 03:12    (last part of the whole post) After so many generations of complacency, how is it possible to change the status quo of oppressed women now? It is possible by properly diagnosing the problem. It is a skewed perspective to make the generalization that Muslim women are oppressed; a view that is generally derived from counting the number of women wearing headscarves. It may be the case that it is actually the women who are not wearing headscarves that are more oppressed. In the Muslim world, there is an endemic problem of oppression of people—men and women—by the ruling powerful elite. Some of these powerful elite are in fact women. Consider, for example, the situation in Bangladesh: two powerful women ruled the country for nearly two decades, but did the status of women improve during their rule? Did the status of women improve when Turkey was governed by a woman prime minister? Did the status of women improve when a woman led the government in Pakistan? Abuse of power is just as oppressive when exerted by women. I believe that it will be possible to change the status of women when the question of oppression is properly framed, when cruelty is not given a gender, when abuse is not given an ethnicity, and when arrogance is not given a race. What do you perceive to be the main ideas of Contesting Justice? To take the Western reader beyond stereotypes, remind Muslim religious authorities of the richness of their legal heritage, reframe the question of social justice outside the context of race, gender, and religion, and identify majoritism and power-enabled arrogance as the platform for discrimination against and subordination of the vulnerable individuals and groups. If putting women in positions of power will not improve the female standard of living, then what will? The status of women cannot be improved in the long run by categorizing it as a gendered issue; that is, men oppressing women. Women, just like men, when enabled by unbridled power, can be just as brutal and cruel as men. Second, women are treated as second-class citizens in many Muslim countries not just because they are women, but because oppression is tolerated in the first place and because women are members of a vulnerable group that is systematically marginalized and abused. Third, legal reform alone will not solve the epidemic of oppression; all that legal reform provides is a tool to alleviate suffering. But like any other tool, it comes with a price and that price may be too steep for the poor, the disadvantaged, and the oppressed. Subsequently, the elite and the powerful from the oppressed group will seize the opportunities provided by legal reform, but those in need cannot. In the end, at best, you end up creating a minority-elite within historically disadvantaged groups, thereby shuffling the power-holders but never treating the question of oppression and abuse of power. Fourth, my book argues for a solution that trusts in the power of civil society institutions and in a culture that encourages awareness of the abusive nature of political power and the propensity of power-holders to oppress the weak and the voiceless. In the end, a combination of measures will work, but creating civil society institutions must be the top priority. On top of the hierarchy of the list of civil society institutions are the free press, legally protected watchdog organizations, and truly independent branches of governance. Legal reform (or education) alone is like going to an ocean full of fish and expecting to fish without fishing gear.

Evelyn Collaborator Registered: Sep 2008 Post Number: 113 Apr 28, 2009 - 12:20    Women have far too many rights. Females are in more danger today than ever before, because they try to be more independent than Mother Nature intended. Female servicewomen are unbelievable. I am convinced that God hates America and wants to destroy it, because he allowed women in the military. Who fought for this right and why? It is unfathomable.

Page 1 2 3

Other Sections on Women's Rights

(Also accessible from the title tabs)

Women's Rights - Web Guide

Women's International Center Including the Living Legacy Awards, women's resources on the net, etc. English - At wic.org

More websites in the section Women's Rights...

Information on using the message board, on the Help pages. For example: * To reply to a visitor by email or to a collaborator by form, you may click on the name. * With a free account, you can keep your email address confidential, receive notifications of new messages, etc. * Off-topic posts may be moved or deleted. Repeated posts may be deleted. * Be nice. Before writing, please read other people's messages on your topic. Thank you! Add Your Message Here Topic: Within the subjects of the People in Action web guide (ecology, solidarity, personal growth, social change...), messages on this page should be related to Women's Rights. Please click to see links about this topic before writing your message. You may also search for pages with messages or links on other topics. Text: -Color- Black Red Green Blue Yellow Purple Orange Cyan Gray -Font- Arial Courier Symbol Times Verdana -Size- Small (-1) Normal Large (+1) Name or Username: Posting Information: Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your name and your e-mail address. Password: E-mail: Options: Activate URLs in message (Internet addresses like http://...) Action: Board Help

Home - Search - New - Web Guide: Ecology, Solidarity, Personal Growth, Social Change, Countries ... Shopping Guide: Books, DVD, Music ... - Español - Contents, Index, Random - Archive - Board - Donate, About

Women's Rights - Message Board - People in Action http://peopleinaction.com/board/2/703.html